Skip to main content
📝

CMS Checklist for AI-Built Apps

Manage marketing pages and blog content

When you vibe code cms with tools like Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, v0, or Claude Code, the generated code often works in development but misses critical production requirements. This checklist helps you catch what AI missed before you ship.

Danger Zone

moderate risk

When your marketing team can't update the homepage without filing a ticket, you've become the bottleneck

A CMS looks simple on the surface — fields for text, images, and a save button. But behind that is a whole system that needs to work: handling images without breaking your site's speed, making sure content changes don't break the layout, versioning so you can undo mistakes, previewing changes before they go live, and managing who can edit what. Get it wrong and you're either locked into manual deploys for every typo fix or dealing with published content that crashes your site.

Failure scenario

You launch with blog posts as markdown files in your code. Works great at first. Six months later, your marketing team wants to add a case study section with custom layouts, your sales team needs landing pages for campaigns, and legal needs to update terms monthly. Every content change requires you to edit files, test locally, and deploy. You've become a human bottleneck charging $100/hour to fix typos.

Common mistakes

  • Images uploaded directly to your hosting without optimization (site loads get slower with every new image)
  • No content versioning — when someone overwrites something important, it's gone forever
  • Preview doesn't match what actually goes live (so published content breaks)
  • No validation on content fields — so a missing image or too-long title breaks your page layout
  • Anyone with access can publish anything immediately (no approval workflow)

Time to break: 3-6 months before content needs outgrow your setup

How are you building this?

Showing what to check when using a managed service

Audit Prompts

Copy these into your AI coding assistant to check your implementation.

Will large images slow down your site?
performance
Check how images are handled in our CMS setup. When someone uploads a large image, is it automatically resized and compressed? Are images served in modern formats (like WebP) for faster loading? Can editors upload any size image or are there reasonable limits? Test uploading a huge image and see what happens to page load speed.

Content editors aren't web performance experts. If your CMS lets them upload 10MB photos that become 10MB images on your homepage, your site will feel painfully slow.

Can content changes break your site?
reliability
Look at how content from the CMS flows into your site. If someone forgets to fill in a required field, does the page break or handle it gracefully? If a title is way too long, does it overflow and mess up the layout? Can editors preview changes exactly as they'll appear live before publishing? Is there validation preventing obviously wrong content (like a negative price)?

Content editors shouldn't need to know about character limits or required fields. Your CMS should prevent content that breaks your site from being published.

Is your content locked to one CMS forever?
cost
Check how content is stored and retrieved. Can you export all your content in a standard format (like JSON or markdown)? Is your frontend code tightly coupled to this specific CMS's structure, or could you swap to a different CMS without rewriting everything? Are you using CMS-specific features that would be hard to replicate elsewhere?

Switching CMSs later means migrating hundreds or thousands of content items. If your code and content structure are married to one provider, you're stuck with their pricing and features forever.

Can you undo content mistakes?
reliability
Test what happens when content gets messed up. If someone accidentally deletes an important page or overwrites content, can you restore a previous version? How far back does version history go? Can you see who made each change and when? Is there a way to schedule content to publish at a specific time?

Content mistakes happen constantly. Without version history and rollback, one bad publish can mean hours of work recreating what was there before.

Checklist

0/10 completed

Smart Move

It depends

If it's just you writing blog posts occasionally, markdown files in your code are fine. If you have a team that needs to update content independently, or if you're changing content more than weekly, a CMS saves you time immediately. The free tiers are generous enough that you're really choosing between your time and their cut.

Sanity

Flexible content modeling, real-time collaboration, great for complex sites with lots of content types

100,000 API requests/month free, 3 users

Contentful

Enterprise-grade with strong permissions and workflows — good if content needs approval before publishing

1 space, 25,000 records, 2 users free

Payload

Open source CMS you host yourself — full control, no vendor fees, but you handle updates and hosting

Fully free but you pay hosting costs

Keystatic

Git-based CMS that stores content as files in your repo — simple, works great for marketing sites and docs

Completely free, open source

Tradeoffs

MDX in your code repo is free and simple but makes non-developers dependent on you. A hosted CMS costs money at scale but lets your team move fast. Self-hosted options like Payload save money but mean you're responsible for uptime and security.

Did you know?

The average marketing team makes 4-6 content updates per week. If each one requires developer time to deploy, that's 12-18 hours per month spent being a content bottleneck.

Source: Content Marketing Institute 2024 Benchmarks Report

Related Checks